Moves
PIMMS samples configurations with Metropolis Monte Carlo (MC). At each step it
picks a move at random (according to the MOVE_* fractions, which must sum to
1.0), proposes the corresponding change, and accepts or rejects it so that the
simulation converges on the correct Boltzmann distribution. This section has one
page per move: each describes how the move works, why it preserves detailed
balance, and the configuration relevant to it.
The move set at a glance
Code |
Keyword |
Status |
Move |
|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
core |
Local single-bead perturbations (the workhorse) |
2 |
|
core |
Rigid translation of a whole chain |
3 |
|
core |
Rigid 90/180/270° rotation of a whole chain |
4 |
|
core |
Pivot one half of a chain about an interior point |
5 |
|
core |
Pivot a single terminus (rarely useful) |
6 |
|
core |
Reptation - the chain slides forwards/backwards |
7 |
|
core |
Rigid translation of a connected cluster of chains |
8 |
|
core |
Rigid rotation of a connected cluster of chains |
9, 10, 12 |
|
stable |
Temperature-switch (tempered-transitions) excursions |
11 |
|
stable |
Cooperative reptation of a sub-segment (dense systems) |
13 |
|
stable |
Relax → jump → relax a single chain |
14 |
|
experimental |
Virtual-Move MC collective cluster move |
(The three TSMMC variants share one page, since they are the same algorithm
applied at different scopes.) Only the VMMC move is still experimental and
requires EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES : True; the temperature-switch, pull and
jump-and-relax moves are stable and need no special flag.
A detailed-balance primer
Every move is constructed so that the simulation samples the Boltzmann distribution
where \(x\) is a configuration, \(E(x)\) its energy, \(T\) the
TEMPERATURE and \(Z\) a normalising constant. (PIMMS works in reduced
units where Boltzmann’s constant is absorbed into \(T\).)
A sufficient condition for converging on \(\pi\) is detailed balance: for every pair of configurations \(x, y\), the move’s transition probability \(P\) must satisfy
A move is built from a proposal \(g(x\to y)\) (the random change it suggests) and an acceptance probability \(A(x\to y)\), so \(P(x\to y) = g(x\to y)\,A(x\to y)\) for \(y\neq x\). The Metropolis-Hastings acceptance
satisfies (1) for any proposal. The ratio \(g(y\to x)/g(x\to y)\) corrects for an asymmetric proposal.
Two important special cases recur throughout this section:
Symmetric proposal. If forward and reverse proposals are equally likely, \(g(x\to y) = g(y\to x)\), the ratio is 1 and (2) reduces to the plain Metropolis criterion \(A = \min(1, e^{-\Delta E/T})\) with \(\Delta E = E(y)-E(x)\). The local and rigid-body moves (crankshaft, translate, rotate, pivot, cluster moves) all use this.
Composition of valid moves. A sequence of updates that each individually leave \(\pi\) invariant also leaves \(\pi\) invariant. Several PIMMS moves are “megamoves” - many sub-moves bundled into one step - or composites (e.g. Jump and relax) that rely on this fact.
Where a move needs more than these (a genuine Hastings ratio, a work-accumulation factor, or a link-probability product), the relevant page derives it explicitly.
Note
Hard-sphere overlaps are rejected outright: PIMMS never allows two beads on the same site, which is equivalent to assigning such configurations infinite energy (\(\pi = 0\)), consistent with (1).